Something went wrong. Try again.
What happens if I push all of nixpkgs
Something went wrong. Try again.
nixpkgs pkgs development python-modules kconfiglib 0001-Add-rudimentary-support-for-modules-property.patch
2.0 kB · 41 lines
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142From 3161fec0b9ff9154dbd952c3481400118fabb744 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001From: Helmut Grohne <helmut.grohne@intenta.de>Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2022 10:07:53 +0200Subject: [PATCH] Add rudimentary support for modules property
In linux commit 6dd85ff178cd76851e2184b13e545f5a88d1be30, Linux Torvaldschanged "option modules" to plain "modules" since it was the only optionleft. kconfiglib does not have much support for either besides parsingit and suppressing warnings when it is applied to the 'MODULES' symbol.Mirror this behaviour for the newer "modules" property.
Fixes: #106--- kconfiglib.py | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kconfiglib.py b/kconfiglib.pyindex c67895c..ccef123 100644--- a/kconfiglib.py+++ b/kconfiglib.py@@ -3263,6 +3263,20 @@ def _parse_props(self, node): else: self._parse_error("unrecognized option") + elif t0 is _T_MODULES:+ # 'modules' formerly was 'option modules'. See above for why+ # and when it is ignored. It was changed in+ # linux commit 6dd85ff178cd76851e2184b13e545f5a88d1be30.+ if node.item is not self.modules:+ self._warn("the 'modules' property is not supported. Let "+ "me know if this is a problem for you, as it "+ "wouldn't be that hard to implement. Note that "+ "modules are supported -- Kconfiglib just "+ "assumes the symbol name MODULES, like older "+ "versions of the C implementation did when "+ "'modules' wasn't used.",+ self.filename, self.linenr)+ elif t0 is _T_OPTIONAL: if node.item.__class__ is not Choice: self._parse_error('"optional" is only valid for choices')